Hello, my name is Anthony DiGiorgio out of UCSF Department of Neurosurgery, and I'm discussing our paper on the effects of various medical malpractice reform laws on malpractice rates, payouts, and premiums. No disclosures. So our study looked to investigate the various medical malpractice laws in the United States. There's a number of different laws that have been sought to limit medical malpractice cases, especially for those lawsuits. This leads to a significant state-by-state variability with a wide variation in the malpractice climate in each state. We wanted to see if the various reforms affect the rate of malpractice claims, the average claim payout, the average insurance premium, and how many neurosurgeons per capita reside in that state. The independent variables were largely the different reform laws. For example, we looked at damage capitation, whereby pain and suffering payouts are limited. We looked at contributory negligence, whereby different state reform laws allow for the account of patient's own negligence in their overall outcome. We looked at various states that have put in expert witness reforms. We looked at whether or not the state has the presence of a medical review panel. We looked at collateral source reform, whereby damages can be reduced if an insurance payout has already been made. We looked at states that allowed for joint and several liability, whereby different claimants, different defendants, would be ruled against separately. We looked at attorney fee capitation. And then to adjust for all these, we also looked at median household income. We did multivariate modeling, and our results showed that damage capitation was the only variable significantly correlated with reduced insurance premiums. Furthermore, median household income alone was associated with an increased malpractice rate. It was an inverse relationship, whereby places that had a lower median income had a higher rate of malpractice cases, and there are no other significant interactions. So in conclusion, damage capitation certainly has the strongest correlation with observable surrogates for the malpractice climate. However, we likely didn't find other correlates because these laws are so variable. And while we tried to categorize them into discrete variables, there's a lot of variability within the states. We also found that lower median household income was associated with more malpractice claims, which intuitively makes sense. Clearly, more research is needed on this topic.

video

medical malpractice reform laws

malpractice rates

payouts

premiums